Build secure · Secure Code Review
Catch the critical flaws automated scanners can't reason about
Automated scanners stop at superficial syntax patterns. Our researchers combine AI-assisted codebase mapping with hands-on manual code review to trace data flows, trust boundaries, and business logic from source to sink. We find the broken authorization, race conditions, cryptographic weaknesses, and logic bypasses that automated tools miss, delivering tested, line-by-line patches your developers can merge immediately.
Outcomes
What you walk away with
Zero false-positive findings with exact repository file paths, line numbers, and verified fixes
Business-logic and authorization flaws caught before hitting production
Supply chain and third-party dependency vulnerability reachability verified
Executive summary and retest verification accepted by SOC 2, ISO 27001, and enterprise reviewers
Coverage
What's in scope
Vulnerability classes audited
- Authentication, session management, and token validation (JWT, OAuth)
- Object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR), multi-tenant isolation, and RBAC
- Injection flaws (SQLi, NoSQLi, command injection, SSRF, template injection)
- Cryptographic implementation, key storage, and randomness flaws
- Business logic flaws, concurrency issues, and race conditions
- Third-party dependency reachability and supply-chain vulnerabilities
Our review approach
- AI-assisted AST indexing to map attack surfaces and trust boundaries
- Manual threat-led source code exploration targeting crown-jewel data flows
- Proof-of-concept exploit verification to eliminate false alarms
- Direct engineer-to-engineer PR review comments or Git diff patches
Deliverables
- Detailed Code Audit Report with CVSS v4.0 scores, root cause, and tested patches
- Executive Summary & Letter of Attestation for compliance and customer security reviews
- Pull-request ready code fixes and secure helper recommendations
- Developer debrief walkthrough and post-remediation code verification
Standards & frameworks
- OWASP ASVS (Level 1-3)
- OWASP Top 10
- CWE/SANS Top 25
- NIST SSDF (SP 800-218)
- PCI DSS v4.0 Req. 6.2
Ideal for
- Teams preparing major platform releases, new API versions, or microservice refactors
- Fintech, healthtech, and enterprise SaaS handling sensitive PII, payments, or healthcare records
- Companies requiring independent code review evidence for SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 compliance
FAQ
Secure Code Review questions
Which languages and frameworks do you review?
We review TypeScript/JavaScript (Next.js, Node.js), Python (Django, FastAPI, Flask), Go, Java/Kotlin (Spring Boot), C# (.NET Core), PHP (Laravel), Swift, Rust, and Ruby on Rails. Ask us about any custom or proprietary stack.
How do you handle repository access and code confidentiality?
We work under a mutual NDA before any access is granted. We support read-only GitHub/GitLab org invitations, time-boxed service accounts, or encrypted repo tarballs. Your code is never used to train external AI models.
Related
Often combined with
Threat Modeling
Map how your system can be attacked before code ships, and decide which controls actually matter.
AppSec & DevSecOps Consulting
Embed security into your CI/CD pipelines, shift security left, and establish customer-centric secure coding guidelines and developer documentation.
Web Application Pentesting
AI-native, expert-verified testing of your web apps, from auth bypass to business-logic abuse.
Ready to talk about secure code review?
Tell us what you're building. In a free 30-minute scoping call we'll map your risks and recommend the right engagement, whether you need a pentest, a threat model or an AI security review.